As the Philippines basks in the glory of its historic victory over China at the Permanent Court of Arbitration, Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio has taken a strong stance against President Rodrigo Duterte’s policy on the West Philippine Sea. In a critical assessment, Carpio argued that Duterte’s actions are inconsistent with the country’s sovereign rights and obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
Carpio emphasized that the ruling is not just a victory for the Philippines but also a significant milestone in the country’s efforts to protect its territorial integrity. He pointed out that the decision has far-reaching implications, as it sets a precedent for other countries with similar claims.
The Supreme Court justice also highlighted the importance of upholding international law and adhering to the principles enshrined in UNCLOS. By doing so, he underscored the need for the government to adopt a more assertive stance in defending its interests in the disputed waters.
In his critique, Carpio cited specific examples where Duterte’s actions have compromised the country’s position, including the president’s decision to establish economic ties with China without securing concessions on territorial claims. He also questioned the validity of the joint fishing patrols between Philippine and Chinese vessels, saying that they may be seen as tacit recognition of China’s nine-dash line claim.
Carpio’s unyielding commitment to upholding international law has earned him both praise and criticism from various quarters. While some see him as a champion of Philippine sovereignty, others view his stance as too confrontational. Nevertheless, his position serves as a reminder that the country’s leaders must remain steadfast in their defense of its rights and interests.