Carpio Asserts Constitutional Validity of Same-Sex Civil Agreements

On June 26, 2018, Acting Chief Justice Antonio Carpio made a pivotal remark during the Supreme Court’s oral arguments on a petition seeking to nullify the Family Code provisions limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples. In his statement, Carpio emphasized that civil partnerships between same-sex individuals are constitutional, regardless of whether they are embodied in law.

Carpio drew a distinction between the ‘historical, biblical, and social understanding’ of marriage as being between a man and a woman, while acknowledging that same-sex couples can forge agreements regarding property without infringing on the traditional concept of marriage. He further suggested that these partnerships could be seen as a new development or union, separate from traditional marriage.

The acting Chief Justice’s assertion came amidst oral arguments by Solicitor General Jose Calida, who opposed the petition to declare Articles 1 and 2 of the Family Code unconstitutional. Carpio directed the parties to submit their respective memoranda within 30 days before adjourning session, after which the case will be deemed submitted for resolution.

Read more about this story on GMA News Online.