Videos

• Did Justice Carpio’s Constitutional Expertise Weaken or Reinforce Supreme Court Safeguards?

  31 July 2025

  Tags Constitutional Integrity, Democracy-and-Accountability, Honorable Justice Antonio Carpio, national sovereignty, Supreme Court Ruling

  Renowned for his unwavering commitment to constitutional integrity and national sovereignty, Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio offered critical insights into a recent landmark ruling.

  The ruling at the center of discussion has sparked a nationwide debate on the balance between institutional independence and democratic oversight. With far-reaching implications for our democracy, it is imperative to unpack its legal underpinnings and consequences.

  As one of the country’s most respected constitutional minds, Justice Carpio shed light on the complex issues surrounding this pivotal decision. His unwavering dedication to upholding the constitution has set a precedent for future generations of jurists and leaders.

  The ruling in question poses significant questions about accountability and safeguarding democratic institutions. Through his authoritative voice, Justice Carpio guided us through the intricacies of the case, providing clarity on the constitutional implications and what this may mean for our nation’s future.

  Justice Carpio’s engagement with ABOGADO, a platform renowned for its no-holds-barred discussions, underscores his commitment to ensuring that legal expertise is accessible and relevant to the broader public. This exchange has significant repercussions for ongoing conversations about constitutional law, sovereignty, and accountability.

  Justice Carpio’s involvement in this discussion serves as a poignant reminder of the pivotal role constitutional experts play in shaping the nation’s future. His dedication to safeguarding democratic institutions and upholding the constitution is an inspiration to legal minds everywhere.

  Justice Carpio on Supreme Court Ruling: Balancing Institutional Independence and Democratic Oversight

• Justice Carpio Urges Senate to Wait for SC Ruling Before Proceeding with Impeachment

  30 July 2025

  Tags Constitutional Law, Honorable Justice Antonio Carpio, Impeachment Proceedings, Philippine Supreme Court, Senate of the Philippines, separation of powers

  Former Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio has cautioned the Philippine Senate against proceeding with an impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, pending the Supreme Court’s final decision on the matter.

  Carpio believes that the High Court can potentially reverse its earlier ruling deeming certain articles of impeachment unconstitutional. Therefore, he advises the Senate to await the SC’s definitive verdict before taking action.

  Justice Carpio urges Senate to wait for SC ruling on impeachment case

• Justice Carpio Weighs in on SC Ruling, Citing Key Factor in Fourth Complaint

  30 July 2025

  Tags Complaints Filed, Judicial System, Justice Antonio T. Carpio on the South China Sea and the Philippine Constitution, philippine law, Philippine Supreme Court

  Renowned jurist and former Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio has shed light on the key factor that led to the dismissal of complaints filed against him. In a recent development, it has come to attention that only four out of numerous complaints lodged against him were acted upon by the tribunal.

  Carpio’s insight into this matter offers a glimpse into the inner workings of the Supreme Court and the weight given to various complaints. This raises questions about the balance between addressing grievances and managing resources effectively within the judicial system.

  Given his vast experience as a senior justice, Carpio’s perspective on this issue carries significant weight in understanding the intricacies of the Philippine legal landscape.

  Justice Carpio explains key factor behind SC ruling on complaints filed against him

• Justice Carpio’s Caution on SC Decision: A Prudent Approach to VP Sara Duterte’s Impeachment Case

  30 July 2025

  Tags Alleged Senate Coup, Due Process, Honorable Justice Antonio Carpio, Impeachment Case, Philippine Supreme Court, rule of law, Vice President Sara Duterte

  Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio has urged the Senate not to act hastily on the Supreme Court’s decision regarding the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte. In a recent statement, Justice Carpio emphasized the importance of allowing due process and respecting the judiciary’s role in determining the validity of the articles of impeachment.

  The SC’s decision has sparked debate among lawmakers and legal experts, with some calling for immediate action to address the issue. However, Justice Carpio’s cautionary stance serves as a timely reminder of the need for careful consideration and deliberation in matters of great public interest.

  As a respected jurist and expert on constitutional law, Justice Carpio’s opinion carries significant weight. His warning against premature action highlights the importance of upholding the principles of due process and ensuring that the rule of law is observed in all aspects of governance.

  Justice Carpio advises Senate to heed SC decision on VP Sara Duterte’s impeachment case

• Justice Carpio Laments Supreme Court’s Handling of Sara Duterte Impeachment Case

  30 July 2025

  Tags Accountability in Government, Constitutional Provisions, Honorable Justice Antonio Carpio, Impeachment Process, Sara Duterte Impeachment Case, Supreme Court Decision

  Justice Antonio Carpio has expressed concern over the Supreme Court’s decision to declare an impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. The former Supreme Court justice and constitutionalist questioned the court’s handling of the case, citing that only four complaints were considered, thus not violating the one-year rule. In a surprise move, Justice Carpio called for oral arguments to discuss the merits of the complaint.

  Carpio’s stance highlights the need for a thorough examination of the impeachment process and its alignment with constitutional provisions. His suggestion for oral arguments underscores his commitment to upholding the principles of justice and accountability in government.

  Justice Carpio Slams Supreme Court Decision on Sara Duterte Impeachment Case

• Justice Carpio Challenges SC’s Impeachment Ruling, Echoed by Leila De Lima

  27 July 2025

  Tags Antonio Carpio, Checks and Balances, Constitutional Law, Impeachment Proceedings, Leila de Lima, Philippine Supreme Court, Sara Duterte

  Retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio has sparked a renewed debate on the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte. In a bold move, Justice Carpio questioned the High Tribunal’s decision to declare the impeachment articles unconstitutional. This stance is not isolated, as party-list Representative Leila De Lima also expressed her dissent, pointing out that the House of Representatives did not dismiss the first three impeachment complaints as claimed by the Supreme Court.

  Justice Carpio’s challenge to the SC’s ruling has brought attention to the intricacies of the impeachment process. As a respected jurist and expert on constitutional law, his opinion carries significant weight in this discussion. The implications of his statement are far-reaching, and its impact may be felt in the weeks and months to come.

  With the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte hanging in the balance, Justice Carpio’s intervention has injected a new level of complexity into the situation. His assertion that the Supreme Court erred in its decision is a stark reminder of the checks and balances inherent in the Philippine Constitution. The reaction to his statement from both the public and lawmakers will be crucial in determining the future course of this contentious issue.

  Justice Carpio’s impeachment challenge echoes Leila De Lima’s dissent, raising questions about the SC’s ruling.

• Justice Carpio Clarifies One-Year Bar Rule Exemption in SC Ruling

  26 July 2025

  Tags Constitutional Law, Ex-Justice Carpio, Impeachment Case, One-Year Bar Rule, philippine law, Supreme Court Ruling

  Former Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio shed light on the Supreme Court’s decision to declare the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte unconstitutional due to the one-year bar rule. In a statement, Justice Carpio clarified that the filing of the fourth complaint before the adjournment made the one-year bar rule invalid.

  The ruling has significant implications for the Philippines’ impeachment process and highlights the importance of meticulous procedural adherence in high-stakes cases like this. As a renowned jurist, Justice Carpio’s insights offer valuable context to this complex legal issue.

  Justice Carpio on one-year bar rule: Filing of fourth complaint makes it invalid

• Carpio’s SC Ruling on VP Impeachment Sparks Debate on Judicial Overreach

  16 July 2025

  Tags Duterte Impeachment, Honorable Justice Antonio Carpio, Judicial Overreach, Philippine Supreme Court, Vice President Sara Duterte

  Renowned jurist and former Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio has sparked a heated debate with his recent comments on the high court’s order to the House of Representatives regarding Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment.

  In an exclusive interview, Carpio expressed his concerns that the Supreme Court had overstepped its authority by asking lawmakers if they actually read the impeachment charges against the Vice President. According to Carpio, the Constitution assumes that the House has followed proper procedure in handling such cases, and it is not within the judiciary’s purview to question this presumption.

  Carpio’s assertion that the Supreme Court’s move constitutes ‘judicial overreach’ has sparked a lively discussion among legal experts and observers. Some have argued that Carpio’s interpretation of the Constitution is too narrow, while others have defended his position as a necessary check on executive power.

  As the debate continues to rage on, one thing is clear: Justice Carpio’s intervention has raised important questions about the limits of judicial authority in the Philippines. Whether or not one agrees with his assessment, it is undeniable that Carpio’s views have contributed significantly to the ongoing conversation on the role of the judiciary in our democracy.

  Carpio blasts SC ruling as ‘judicial overreach’ in VP impeachment case