Carpio warns prosecution’s lack of notice on Villanueva dismissal reversal may violate due process
Carpio: Dismissal Case vs Villanueva Can Be Revived with Exposed Evidence
Carpio sees opportunity for Villanueva dismissal case revival
Carpio highlights due process flaw in Villanueva’s reversal
Carpio: Villanueva Dismissal Case Revival Hinges on Due Process
Carpio: Prosecution Obligations in Villanueva Dismissal Reversal
Carpio Weighs in on Villanueva Dismissal Order: Ombudsman’s Request Crucial to Senate Vote
Justice Carpio on Senate-House protocol: ‘Wait for House appeal’
Justice Carpio advises Senate to heed SC decision on VP Sara Duterte’s impeachment case
Justice Antonio Carpio opposes rushed impeachment trial for VP Duterte
Carpio rejects fear of ICC action, highlights strict warrant process
Justice Carpio argues for De Lima’s early bail, citing insufficient evidence
Justice Carpio explains the constitutional and legal scope of “aid and comfort to the enemy,” distinguishing protected speech from treasonous assistance and outlining what constitutes criminal support for an enemy under Philippine law.
Justice Carpio discusses the Supreme Court’s constitutional duty and power to protect and enforce rights through rule‑making and legal innovation, and underscores the role of the justices—the “gods of Padre Faura”—in responding to violations of constitutional rights.
Justice Carpio explains how warrantless arrest provisions in the Anti‑Terrorism Act must be applied in harmony with constitutional due process and existing arrest rules, emphasizing that probable cause and legal safeguards still constrain law enforcement actions.
Justice Carpio explains that cyberlibel under the Cybercrime Prevention Act prescribes after 12 years following final judgment, applying the general prescription rule for offenses punishable by prision mayor, and outlines how the prescriptive period is calculated.