Former Justice Antonio Carpio and Rep. Joey Salceda clash over an allegedly unconstitutional 2024 budget provision on GOCC funds, with Salceda denying authorship and citing legislative process.
Justice Carpio exposes misuse of PhilHealth and PDIC funds diverted to flawed flood-control projects, highlighting legal violations and accountability issues.
Justice Carpio explains key factor behind SC ruling on complaints filed against him
Justice Carpio: ICC has jurisdiction over Duterte’s crimes against humanity case
Carpio examines Duterte’s ICC case from a legal standpoint
Justice Carpio weighs in on PH gov’t’s ICC case preparations
Justice Carpio Clarifies Consequences of VP Sara’s Impeachment Trial
Philippine lawmakers urged to pass divorce bill to help abused couples
Justice Carpio explains the role and admissibility of extrajudicial confessions in evidence law, particularly how voluntarily made public statements can be used alongside corroborating proof in investigations of alleged extrajudicial killings.
Justice Carpio explains why and how a sitting Philippine President is immune from civil or criminal suits under national law and jurisprudence, outlining its constitutional bases, judicial precedents, and implications for accountability and investigation.
Justice Carpio explains why the Philippines’ statutory definition of “indigenous people” under IPRA lacks historical and ethnic basis for most Filipinos, arguing that this imported legal concept divides the nation and creates unnecessary social and legal conflict.
Justice Carpio explains why, under the Anti‑Terrorism Act, the CPP‑NPA’s armed rebellion does not by itself classify them as “terrorists,” because the law distinguishes terrorism from rebellion and requires intent to create widespread fear, meaning rebels cannot be automatically proscribed as a terrorist group.
Justice Carpio explains that cyberlibel under the Cybercrime Prevention Act prescribes after 12 years following final judgment, applying the general prescription rule for offenses punishable by prision mayor, and outlines how the prescriptive period is calculated.
Justice Carpio explains why martial law is unnecessary and legally unwarranted for managing a public health crisis like COVID‑19, highlighting constitutional standards and existing statutory emergency powers that protect both public safety and civil liberties.
Justice Carpio discusses the lingering devastation at Marawi City’s Ground Zero, the legal barriers preventing displaced residents from returning, and why a presidential proclamation making the land alienable and disposable could restore land rights and community trust.
Justice Carpio explains why redefining “public utility” through ordinary law to exclude telecommunications and transportation would erode the Constitution’s foreign‑ownership limits, bypass the amendment process, and weaken Filipino control of key sectors.
Justice Carpio discusses the concept of “mother of onerous contracts” to critique procurement practices that favor suppliers at the expense of the public interest, highlighting the need for transparency and strict adherence to constitutional procurement safeguards.
Justice Antonio Carpio’s retirement dinner: a celebration of a remarkable career
Justice Carpio’s decision to inhibit from West PH Sea case raises questions about potential biases in the judiciary.
Justice Antonio Carpio weighs in on recent Supreme Court decision, sparking debate among legal experts
Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio’s bid for Supreme Court chief justice sparks debate over his qualifications
Justice Carpio’s impact on good governance continues with Ombudsman Morales’ retirement
Justice Antonio T. Carpio’s 22 June 2018 address to UP–NCPAG graduates warns against divisive proposals—such as “First Nation” designations, expansive autonomous movements, and abandoning the 2016 arbitral award—and calls on Filipinos to uphold national unity, sovereignty, and maritime rights.